As part of my political review for this election year, I
will be review each of the presidential candidate. I will present a brief bio
followed by reasons why I would and would not vote for each candidate. Today I
will be reviewing Gary Johnson:
Gary Earl Johnson was born January 1, 1953 in Minot, North
Dakota. The son of Earl and Lorraine (nee Bostow) Johnson. His father was a
public school teacher and his mother worked for the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Mr. Johnson earned his Bachelors of Science degree in political science from
the University of New Mexico in 1975. He started his own business, Big J
Enterprises, in 1976 and grew it into a multimillion dollar corporation with
over 1,000 employees. When he sold the company in 1999, it was one of New
Mexico’s leading construction companies. Mr. Johnson served as governor of New
Mexico from 1995-2003. As governor, he followed a strict small government
approach. He stood with 20 other Republican governors and called on Republican
leadership to stand firm against President Bill Clinton during the November
1995 federal government shutdown in budget negotiations. He was praised for his
leadership during the Cerro Grande Fire in 2000. In 2009, he showed interest in
running for president. On May 29, 2016, he received the presidential nomination
of the Libertarian Party. He is a practicing Lutheran. Divorced with two adult
children. He is currently engaged to his longtime girlfriend, Kelly Prusack. Mr.
Johnson is considered to be a fiscally conservative and socially liberal. He
follows the philosophy of limited government.
On the issues, Mr. Johnson supports repeal of Obamacare and
favors simplifying and reducing taxes. He has acknowledged that man is
partially responsible for climate change, Johnson rejects government action to
try to control or limit it. He has referred to the Social Security
Administration as a pyramid scheme. Mr. Johnson feels that government needs to
stay out of personal concerns like abortions and feels that Planned Parenthood
does a lot of good. He has spoken against the massive natural debt. He favors
gay rights. He favors cutting military budget and is against foreign wars. Mr.
Johnson supports drug decriminalization with some exceptions. He opposes
censorship and regulations of the internet. He also opposes federal and state
gun control as counterproductive. He opposes the Common Core standards and
supports state and local control on education. He opposes mandatory
vaccinations. He believes that parents should decide not the government.
The reasons I would not vote for Gary Johnson are first, he
opposes paid leave and family leave. As a single income family, this concerns
me a great deal. Even for families with two incomes, this should be concerning.
If one income suddenly disappears due to illness or injury, families would
falter in their daily living. Second, I disagree with him on military and
foreign matters. While I do believe that we need to not always be the “world
police,” we can’t simply ignore what is going on in the world around us. The
reasons I would vote for him are first, he supports accurate food labeling for
allergies, GMS and to better define “natural” and “organic.” Second, Mr.
Johnson has both executive government and business experience. Unlike Clinton
who has government experience but not business and Trump who has business
experience but not government. Third, I agree that many issues of daily life
are personal decisions and the government should have no say in the matters.
I believe Gary Johnson is a good candidate for president.
Many have criticized him for not knowing what Aleppo was. However, if we are
honest with ourselves, most of us didn’t know either. While I disagree with him
on many issues, I like his honesty about the issues. He has been constant with
his support and opposition on the issues; however, I wouldn’t fault him for
changing his opinion. Even if he barely registers with the voting numbers this
election, I think that people talking about him is enough to open the door for
future party candidates to be considered seriously. I also don’t understand the
reluctance of the Democrat and Republican parties to not allow Mr. Johnson or
Ms. Stein (whom I will discuss next), to be a part of the presidential debates.
I remember Ross Perot being a part of the debates during the 1992 presidential
election.
Overall, I believe that considering the other party
candidates is a good thing for this country. For many people, voting for a
third party is a “throw away vote” because the person couldn’t possibly win.
For me, though, voting for a candidate other than the Democrat or Republican is
sending a message that I am fed up with the two parties. It has been an “us
versus them” mentality for too long. Third party officials would be a possible
deciding factor to break the chains of inactions in government. Gary Johnson is
a man who has proven that he is a man of action. Would he do well on a national
scale? I think so but we will never really know unless we look more closely at
the other candidates.
No comments:
Post a Comment