We’ve all heard the phrase, “the book is better than the
movie.” As we all know too that there are usually exceptions to every rule.
There are many examples of books being better than their movie adaptations, the
Harry Potter series for one. However, there are many examples of movie
adaptations being better than the book. While researching this topic, I found
many examples of movies that were better than the original book. For this post,
I will limit my list to movies that I have both read the book and seen the
movies. Here are the 5 movies I believe are better than their literary origins.
First, The Last of the
Mohicans (1992) was written and directed by Michael Mann and adapted from
James Fenimore Cooper’s American classic, The
Last of the Mohicans A Narrative of 1757 (1826). The novel is an 18th
century classic which features the French-Indian War (1754-1763) between
England and France. However, it’s also laden down with dense prose and overly
detailed descriptions with a plot which moves at a glacial pace. The movie
streamlines the action and gets to the heart of the story. Wes Studi brings the
sadistic Magua to life that leaps off the screen in a way the character does
not in the book. Plus, the musical score helps enhance the drama of this part
of American history. The soundtrack with its Gaelic methods and hauntingly
beautiful love song, “I Will Find You,” performed by Clannad helps make this
movie great.
Second, The Lord of
the Rings trilogy (2011-2003) was directed by Peter Jackson and written by
Peter Jackson, Barrie M. Osborne, Fran Walsh, and Tim Sanders. It is, of
course, adapted by the beloved JRR Tolkien’s beloved trilogy, The Lord of the Rings (1954-1955). While
I love the books, and enjoyed for many years before the movies, the movies help
streamline the novels into a great cinematic experience and brought me deeper
into the characters, their struggles and desperation. I feel in love with the
books even more with the imagery of the movies in my head. I could see the
horrors of Mordur and the stumbling steps of Frodo as he pushes himself to
Mount Doom. I know many purest fans were
furious at the omission and changes made. However, some of the omissions were
material that wasn’t necessary to tell the story of the journey to destroy the
One Ring. There are whole chapters that a reader could skip and not miss
anything related to the main story.
Third, Ready Player
One (2018) was directed by Steven Spielberg and written by Zak Penn and
Ernest Cline. It is based on the book Ready
Player One (2011) by Ernest Cline. While I enjoyed the book, the movie
brought the wonder of the virtual world and the devastation of the physical
world that Wade, the main protagonist, lives in. Plus, the book had some video
games references that only a gamer would know and, in my opinion, bogged down
the main story of the search for Halliday’s Easter Egg. I am a novice gamer and
I am not familiar with the detailed history of video games so the long chapters
of explanation about these games were great for me as information; however,
this information was not needed in the movie and would be hard to transform to
the screen. There are also long chapters on the history of the mysterious James
Halliday which is great as exposition in the book but would bog down a film.
Fourth, the Marvel Cinematic Universe (2008-present) is a
great adaptation of the beloved comics. I will admit that I have not read all
the comics these characters appear in and I am not a big fan of reading the
panel format of comics; however, I grew up watching the superhero cartoons. I
have always been a fan of superhero stories. These movies are stunning visuals
of these beloved characters’ adventures and builds a world in which they are
all connected and fighting a main villain as well as their own specific
adventures. The MCU has introduced me to characters that I had not been aware
of, for example Black Panther and the Guardians of the Galaxy, and other
characters that I only knew in passing, like Iron Man and Thor. Also, I believe
the actors who portray these superheroes truly bring life to these characters
and add more human dimensions that just straight forward superheroes.
Lastly, P.S. I Love
You (2007) was directed by Richard LaGravenese and written by LaGravenese
and Steven Rogers. It is based on the novel, P.S. I Love You, by Cecelia Ahern. The book was good; however, the
movie had more of an emotional impact as the main character, Holly, deals with
the aftermath of her husband, Gerry’s, sudden death and her struggle to move on
with her life without him. As with any movie adaptation, changes were made, for
example, the book is set in Ireland while the movie is set primarily in New
York City. However, the essence of the story is there. I found the movie to be
more focused on Holly’s grief as she struggles with life that goes on without
her. The world doesn’t stop for her broken heart and she must learn to find her
place in the world once again. Plus, Gerard Butler as Gerry doesn’t hurt.
In conclusion, most movie adaptations are poor reflections
of their books; however, there are examples of movie adaptations that are better
or enhance the magic of the book. A movie can make pages of scene description
into a stunning visual which helps the audience focus on the story. Yes, there
is more imagination involved when reading a book and visualizing the scene, And
I think this is where people either hate or love movie adaptations because the
directors and writers’ visualizing of a scene is not the one the reader had. There
is a saying “Never judge a book by its movie.” Well, I say never judge a movie
by its book. Some good books can be made into great movies.
No comments:
Post a Comment